increase the availability of cell-culture methodologies and
established cell lines for in vitro studies. These research
resources must be strengthened to promote overall scien-
tific understanding of critical disease pathways and to bring
the use of fish models into the scientific mainstream.
To address such issues, concerned investigators re-
quired a forum. Therefore, we organized a gathering of
scientists with expertise in commonly used aquaria fish
models to share their findings, discuss technology develop-
ment, and recommend future directions. From our initial
contacts with researchers, it became immediately apparent
that such a conference was long overdue. They all expressed
considerable excitement at the opportunity to present re-
cent research results using various fish model systems and
discuss how these nonmammalian models could be better
applied to address contemporary scientific problems.
Accordingly, we held a conference, entitled Aquaria
Fish Models of Human Disease, on September 2023,
2000, at Southwest Texas State University (SWT), San Mar-
cos. The hosts were the SWT Molecular Biosciences Re-
search Group and the staff of the Xiphophorus Genetic Stock
Center. More than 100 scientists including prominent re-
searchers from the United States and several other counties
attending this meeting. They offered a diverse array of mod-
els, such as zebrafish (Danio rerio), platyfish-swordtail hy-
brids (Xiphophorus spp.), medaka (Oryzias latipes), mum-
michog (Fundulus heterolitus), pufferfish (Fugu rubripes),
and the bicolor damselfish (Pomacentrus partitus). Also par-
ticipating at the meeting were virologists working with vi-
rus-induced tumorigenesis in walleye and trout, and the
directors of various fish model resource centers (Fugu,
medaka, Xiphophorus, and zebrafish).
In addition to the scientific presentations, some of
which are reproduced in this supplement, 4 topical working
groups considered issues pertaining to research on non-
mammalian models: (1) Fish Cancer Models: Sustenance
and Enhancement; (2) Fish Genomics and Transgenics: Re-
sources and Technology; (3) Fish Pathology: Standards for
Tumor Pathology Classification; and (4) Resources Under-
pinning Aquaria Fish Research. Summaries of the working
group discussions and recommendations are included
herein (see Final Report).
From the excellent quality of the science presented and
the overall enthusiasm among the participants, we believe
that the Aquaria Fish Models Conference was very success-
ful in achieving its goals. However, this success will be in-
significant if we do not make a concerted effort to execute
the intents of the working groups recommendations: this
practical advice comes from within the community, and will
need to be accomplished by the community.
This conference could not have been held without the
interest and assistance of Drs. David Longfellow and Ying-
Pin Liu of the National Institutes of HealthNational Can-
cer Institute (NIH-NCI) Physical and Chemical Carcino-
gensis Branch). Ms. Roxie Smeal (SWT) undertook the con-
ferences organizational management, helped by Sherry
Brown (SWT) and Ellen Ziaka (NIH-NCI). We owe them a
great debt for their tireless effort on our behalf.
Our sincere appreciation also goes to the four modera-
tors of the working groups (Drs. Rodney Nairn, Michael
Schmale, John Stegman, and Richard Winn) for crystalliz-
ing many issues and discussions into concise group sum-
maries and specific recommendations. Drs. Avril Wood-
head and Thomas Chen organized and supervised the sub-
mission and peer review of the manuscripts in this
publication. Finally, the attendees made this conference
both successful and enjoyable, and we thank them.
The Aquaria Fish Models Conference was sponsored by
the National Institutes of HealthNational Cancer Institute
(Chemical and Physical Carcinogenesis Branch), Southwest
Texas State University, and the Roy F. and Joanne C. Mitte
Foundation.
S2
Ronald B. Walter